COVID-19 Antitrust Documentation
Racketeering, Collusion, Interlocking Directorates, Market Manipulation...
"What we have is the entire cascade of the entirety of the Sherman and Clayton Act. Every single provision of the law has been violated. I‘m not close, ALL of them have [been violated]" —Dr. David Maritn
Video Documentary
For Full Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKX2TAoTTww
https://www.davidmartin.world/
Activate Humanity
Dr. David E. Martin:
- People don‘t understand why I have been so obsessed about making sure the felonies that have been happening during the Covid terror campaign are prosecuted as felonies.
- If you are guilty of committing felony violations of U.S. law, the liability immunity from the 1986 Act (Bayh-Dole Act) and the PREP Act liability go out the window.
- If you can show that this was a criminal set of actions, then they no longer have protection from the immunity protection under the PREP Act and the 1986 act. This, people, IS THE silver bullet and this is what nobody‘s getting.
- The reason why this is so important, the reason why I have been trying to get people to pay attention and the reason why I am going to once again ask each and every one of you, if you know of or if you can send any information to an Attorney General or to a US Attorney.
- The reason I am so passionate about this, people, is the minute we remove liability shields from pharmaceutical companies, pharmaceutical companies will stop selling the thing that they sell only because they get the immunity.
- Listen to me, it‘s really important. And we don‘t understand this and we don‘t understand this at our own peril. If we actually understood the law, we would understand the passion that I have to show that this is in fact a criminal conspiracy and if it shown to be a criminal conspiracy, all of the liability shields fall away.
LAWS THAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
The Sherman Act & Clayton Act:
15 U.S. Code § 1. Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal;
penalty
Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or
conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or
with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make
any contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy hereby declared to
be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof,
shall be punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or,
if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years,
or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.
15 U.S. Code §2 Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty
Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $10,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $350,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding three years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.
15 U.S. Code § 19 Interlocking directorates and officers:
(a)(1) No person shall, at the same time, serve as a director or officer in
any two corporations (other than banks, banking associations, and trust
companies) that are—
(A) engaged in whole or in part in commerce; and
(B) by virtue of their business and location of operation, competitors,
so that the elimination of competition by agreement between them would
constitute a violation of any of the antitrust law.
ANTITRUST VIOLATIONS
September of 2019 Dr. Elias from the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation, Dr. Anthony Fauci from NIAID and Dr. Gao from the Chinese Center
for Disease Control and Prevention sat together on the Global Preparedness
Monitoring Board for the World Health Organization – 3 different companies,
all sitting together and all planning a commercial exercise that said from
September 2019 to September 2020, there had to be a simulation run globally
on an intentional or accidental release of a respiratory pathogen and during
that time, a global response for the commercial production of “medical
countermeasures”
Knowing that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (through CDC,
NIH, NIAID, and their funded laboratories and commercial partners) had
patents on each proposed element of medical counter measures and their
funding, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Gao (China CDC), and Dr. Elias (Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation) conspired to commit acts of terror on the global
population – including the citizens of the United States – when, in
September 2019, they published the following mandate:[1]
“Countries, donors and multilateral institutions must be prepared for the worst. A rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen (whether naturally emergent or accidentally or deliberately released) poses additional preparedness requirements. Donors and multilateral institutions must ensure adequate investment in developing innovative vaccines and therapeutics, surge manufacturing capacity, broad-spectrum antivirals and appropriate nonpharmaceutical interventions. All countries must develop a system for immediately sharing genome sequences of any new pathogen for public health purposes along with the means to share limited medical countermeasures across countries."
Progress indicator(s) by September 2020
-
Donors and countries commit and identify timelines for: financing and
development of a universal influenza vaccine, broad spectrum antivirals,
and targeted therapeutics. WHO and its Member States develop options for
standard procedures and timelines for sharing of sequence data,
specimens, and medical countermeasures for pathogens other than
influenza.
-
Donors, countries and multilateral institutions develop a multi-year
plan and approach for strengthening R&D research capacity, in
advance of and during an epidemic.
-
WHO, the United Nations Children’s Fund, the International Federation
of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, academic and other partners
identify strategies for increasing capacity and integration of social
science approaches and researchers across the entire
preparedness/response continuum.” [2]
They are saying, ‘We’re going to do medical countermeasures and we’re
going to force those medical countermeasures into the market and we
are three different companies agreeing to do
this.’ 15 U.S.C. § 19 – Interlocking Directorates
November 2019 Anthony Fauci sent instructions to a company,
Moderna, and said “start making this particular medical countermeasure.”
Now, under the Sherman Act, that’s what we
call 15 U.S.C. §8 – Market Manipulation and Allocation.
Tiny problem: Fauci had also funded them. He also shared patented
technology interests with them.
So now, we have a second 15 U.S.C. § 19 – Interlocking Directorates problem. The first one is September 2019, the second one is November 2019
and the reason why that’s so problematic is because you know that the
company had no experience making any commercial product.
So, this was not market allocation among
fair competitors, this was actually picking somebody who
was unqualified to be picked because there was an established and undisclosed financial interest.
General Accountability Office Oversight document which proves this in all
of the NIH communication about their licensed technologies and listen
carefully, the report that they gave to Congress, in their presentation of
all their licensed technologies they had, they never disclosed the financial
interest that they had in Moderna and Moderna never disclosed in their
patent filings the financial interest the Federal Government had.[3][4],
We know that not only was there failure to disclose, but we know that there
was an established financial interest between the parties. This is the
actual definition of the violation of the law.
So, we have September happen, then we have this November agreement to
actually allocate market and once again it is
important to realize that step
2 market allocation was to pick a
winner and to say we are going to favor one company over another company, a
clear and compelling prima facie violation of the Sherman and the Clayton Act. Because it is illegal to pick a winner when you have the failure to
disclose your financial interest in that winner.
This is all happening before alleged outbreak. We have the antitrust law violations happening whether there’s a
pandemic or not. That’s one set of laws being violated out of the
gate.
But now we have an interesting problem, because we do fast forward to the
spring of 2020 when Moderna’s leadership started selling their stock based
on their public pronouncement by Fauci that they were going to be the
winner—a violation of Securities law.
February 2020 As if to confirm the utility of the September
2019 demand for “financing and development of” vaccine and the fortuitous
SARS CoV-2 alleged outbreak in December of 2019, Dr. Fauci began gloating
that his fortunes for additional funding were likely changing for the
better. In a February 2020 interview in STAT, he was quoted as follows:
““The emergence of the new virus is going to change that figure, likely
considerably, Fauci said. “I don’t know how much it’s going to be. But I
think it’s going to generate more sustained interest in coronaviruses
because it’s very clear that coronaviruses can do really interesting
things.””[5]
SPRING 2020 now we have an interesting problem, because we do
fast forward to the spring of 2020 when Moderna’s leadership started selling
their stock based on their public pronouncement by Fauci that they were
going to be the winner James: which is also a violation and this time
of Securities Laws.
And what we were told is that the leadership of Moderna and I’m sure that
we all understand that when we have been losing money on the verge of
bankruptcy, we would totally expect that the leadership of a company would
have predetermined sell orders for their stock, when their stock was falling
through the floorboards, right? No.
But it turns out that poor Stéphane Bancel and others at Moderna,
these poor people apparently had their hands tied because they had to sell
their stock because they had told the markets that if the stock hit this
price, then they would sell or at a particular time horizon, they would sell
their stock. So, the poor dears had to take billions of dollars off the
table, conveniently when Anthony Fauci was promoting them as the winner.
They had to do it because they had prearranged stock sell orders. That’s the
story we actually were told, and the comedy of that story is you can have a
stock sell order and you can revoke it.
But why would you want to because that stock wasn’t worth shit until just
now and it may not be worth shit in the future, so I better sell it right
this second.
Which is exactly what they did and so what we have is, as we move into
April, we have the crowning achievement of the criminal conspiracy because now what we have is a world in which we have the interlocking directorate problem in September, we have the market allocation interlocking directorate problem in November, we have the unfair competition that we
have going into November, we have the market selection and securities fraud violations that happen in April
and May and then we have a funny little thing, I don’t know if you remember
this, but the news was that the Department of Health and Human Services,
Pfizer and Moderna sat down and they came up with the price for the medical
countermeasure.
Now, just pause for a minute, remember what Moderna’s pricing model was
based on. They said they were going to charge for their technology what
their technology allegedly did, which is it allegedly saved 3-5 days of
hospital admission, they didn’t say that it cost that much to make the
injection, they said that it was worth the cost savings for
hospitalizations. Now, bear with me for a moment, because this is kind of
an important piece of information. If 100% of the population that got
infected all went to the hospital, then it would be fair to say that
keeping people out of the hospital applies at the price basis for the
intervention and that would be a logical thing to say, unethical, but
logical. But the fact of the matter is, most of the people who actually
got an illness, never went to the hospital, so there was no cost savings
of 300 million people times three days of hospital charges at somewhere
between 5000 and 10000 dollars a day. But that’s the price that they came
to and they, with their competitor, which is the coup de grâce, this is the smoking gun— another one.
The smoking gun is they sat together, and they fixed a price
which is the most important anti-competitive step of
proving not only the collusion, not only
the racketeering, but the anti-competitive market harm which was the basis for both the Clayton and the Sherman Act in the first
place.
Why is this important? It’s important because at no point was there a
market price for: taking into account that the public paid for the research,
taking into account that the public paid for the development, taking into
account the public paid for the market selection, taking into account all of
those things and then come up with a price that is market-derived and fair.
Nope, what do we do?
We come up with a price, and we run the price through a third party which
is the Operation WarpSpeed contractor ATI. ATI is the fulcrum of the antitrust racket, because the company that was responsible for Operation WarpSpeed and the
company that was responsible for the distribution of the criminal conspiracy product, that company knew that they were in fact fixing a price that harmed the consumer, that was based on collusion and that had
absolutely no basis and grounding in market dynamics.
In short, let me just wrap this up, we have in setting aside all of the
other things we talked about and I’m literally doing that for the benefit
of this conversation, we have felony, criminal conspiracy, Sherman Act and Clayton Act against NIAID, HHS, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Moderna,
Pfizer and ATI. Those, without question, and please understand, I’m not saying there aren’t others, I’m saying those without question are in fact guilty of violating the antitrust laws of the United States. Without that criminal act and without that criminal conspiracy, we
would not have the current campaign of terror.
SUMMARY
Now, once the evidence is there, the challenge then is to say ok, can I prove that there is collusion, can I prove that this was not just accidentally violating the law, but it‘s actually a willful act of violating the law. And the great news is that as I just laid out this presentation, starting at the foundation of interlocking directorates, adding to that market allocation, adding to that, securities violations by promoting a insider transaction without transparently disclosing conflict of interest, interlocking directorate interest and then ultimately setting a price that was in fact anti-competitive, what we have is the entire cascade of the entirety of the Sherman and Clayton Act. Every single provision of the law has been violated. I‘m not close, all of them have.
[2]https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annual_report/GPMB_annualreport_2019.pdf
[3]https://www.statnews.com/pharmalot/2020/08/28/moderna-covid19-vaccine-coronavirus-patents-darpa/
[4]https://www.keionline.org/moderna
[5]https://www.statnews.com/2020/02/10/fluctuating-funding-and-flagging-interest-hurt-coronavirus-research/
Dr. Martin's Source Documents:
Contact Dr. Martin: Activate Humanity
Dr. David Martin's Fauci/COVID-19 dossier documenting the following crimes:
35 U.S.C. § 101
18 U.S.C. §2339 C et seq. – Funding and Conspiring to Commit Acts of Terror
18 U.S.C. § 2331 §§ 802 – Acts of Domestic Terrorism resulting in death of American Citizens
18 U.S.C. § 1001 – Lying to Congress
15 U.S.C. §1-3 – Conspiring to Criminal Commercial Activity
15 U.S.C. §8 – Market Manipulation and Allocation
15 U.S.C. § 19 – Interlocking Directorates
35 U.S.C. §200 - 206 – Disclosure of Government Interest
21 C.F.R. § 50.24 et seq., Illegal Clinical Trial
The Commercial Actors
FAUCI/COVID-19 DOSSIER
COVID-19 Anti-Trust Video Documentary Clip
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act
For Full Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKX2TAoTTww
COVID-19 ANTI-TRUST SUMMARY PDF
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act
COVID-19 FULL EPISODE TRANSCRIPT
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act
A TIMELINE OF SELECTED FEDERAL FUNDING FOR SARS CORONAVIRUS
Dr. David Martin's SARS CoV Patent Corpus Literature Review reveals over 120 patented pieces of evidence to suggest that the declaration of a novel coronavirus was actually entirely a fallacy.
Dr. Martin's Legal Discovery with Atty. Reiner FuellmichDiscussing COVID-19 RICO, anti-trust and patent fraud violationsBlog Post with Transcript: https://shermanclay.blogspot.com/2021/09/rico-bioweapons-no-pandemic-no-novel.html
Contact Dr. Martin: Activate Humanity
Dr. David Martin's Fauci/COVID-19 dossier documenting the following crimes:
35 U.S.C. § 101
18 U.S.C. §2339 C et seq. – Funding and Conspiring to Commit Acts of Terror
18 U.S.C. § 2331 §§ 802 – Acts of Domestic Terrorism resulting in death of American Citizens
18 U.S.C. § 1001 – Lying to Congress
15 U.S.C. §1-3 – Conspiring to Criminal Commercial Activity
15 U.S.C. §8 – Market Manipulation and Allocation
15 U.S.C. § 19 – Interlocking Directorates
35 U.S.C. §200 - 206 – Disclosure of Government Interest
21 C.F.R. § 50.24 et seq., Illegal Clinical Trial
The Commercial Actors
COVID-19 Anti-Trust Video Documentary Clip
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act
For Full Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKX2TAoTTww
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act
Dr. David Martin's SARS CoV Patent Corpus Literature Review reveals over 120 patented pieces of evidence to suggest that the declaration of a novel coronavirus was actually entirely a fallacy.
https://shermanclay.blogspot.com/2021/10/fauci-and-unc-chapel-hill-imports.html
