• 2021 Sept 29 • Dr. David Martin Interview
Since 1999, at least 4,000 patents involving coronavirus have been filed, including patents detailing key features of the so-called “novel” SARS-CoV-2 virus. In 2002, Ralph Baric, Ph.D. and colleagues at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, filed a patent on recombinant coronavirus, and within a year, we got the world’s first SARS outbreak.
By Dr. Joseph Mercola
Story at-a-glance:
- In the
early 2000s, David Martin, Ph.D., founder of M-CAM International, started
finding large numbers of patents that violate biological and chemical
weapons laws.
- In
1999, Dr.
Anthony Fauci funded research to create “an infectious
replication-defective recombinant coronavirus.” In 2002, Ralph Baric,
Ph.D. and colleagues at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill,
filed a patent on recombinant coronavirus,
and within a year, we got the world’s first SARS outbreak.
- Since
1999, at least 4,000 patents involving coronavirus have been filed,
including patents detailing key features of the so-called “novel” SARS-CoV-2
virus.
- The
2001 anthrax attack, which came out of medical and defense research, led
to the passage of the PREP Act, which removed liability for manufacturers
of emergency medical countermeasures.
- The funds for entitlement programs and pensions will dry up by 2028, at which point the drug industry will go bankrupt as well. With a burgeoning population that is sick from the COVID jabs, we need to prepare new systems to care for each other.
David Martin's legal discovery interview and transcript with Atty. Reiner Fuellmich concerning the illegal patents can be seen here: https://shermanclay.blogspot.com/2021/09/rico-bioweapons-no-pandemic-no-novel.html
In this interview, we continue our coverage of the COVID “plandemic” by speaking to David Martin, Ph.D., who has done a phenomenal job uncovering the paper trail behind the virus now known as SARS-CoV-2.
As it turns out, this is not a novel virus at all, as
patents and government grants detailing key features of the virus go back two
decades. Martin finished his doctorate at the University of Virginia in 1995,
after which he was hired on to the medical school faculty in radiology and
orthopedic surgery.
In 2006, he set up the first medical device clinical trials
organization for the University of Virginia — a company called IDEAmed — which
conducted medical device clinical trials for U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) submission. So, he has an extensive
background working with FDA clinical trials.
Monitoring biological weapons violations
In 1998, he founded another company called M-CAM
International, which is focused on finding ways to bring intellectual property
into conventional finance. M-CAM also started auditing the U.S. patent system
at the request of the U.S. Congress.
In the early 2000s, M-CAM worked with the Senate Banking
Committee and was a contractor for the U.S. Treasury to expose white collar
criminal activity around intellectual property and tax fraud. In doing that
work, Martin also discovered something else.
“Quite alarmingly, we found an
enormous number of patents [detailing] biological and chemical weapon
violations,” Martin says. “That was not something we were looking for. I let
people know this was not something we set out to find. This is something that
landed in our lap.
“I developed a technology a decade
earlier called linguistic genomics, which is a means by which you can look at
unstructured text data and find the metaphoric meaning inside of what is being
communicated.
“As you can imagine, if people of
ill intent are trying to do something, they often hide what they’re doing in
plain sight, but they use language that is not conventional.
“So, when you find a patent, for
example, on a blast-resistant pathogen from a rocket-propelled grenade — did
you hear what I just said? ‘A blast-resistant pathogen from a rocket-propelled
grenade.’ Does that sound like it’s a common way to inoculate a population or
does that sound like [a bioweapon]?
“And so, finding a number of
bioweapons patents, we started taking into account some very serious things. I
published once a year the literal global phonebook of every biological and
chemical weapon violation that took place anywhere in the world.
“[It tells you] the who, the where,
the who funded it, what their addresses are. It was … used by U.S. law
enforcement, intelligence communities and elsewhere around the world to track
things that were being done inappropriately. And, it was in 1999 [that] we
started detecting that there seemed to be an alarming event around coronavirus,
which we’re going to get into.”
Coronavirus identified as a potential vaccine vector
As explained by Martin, in 1999, the National Institutes of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci,
identified coronavirus as a possible vaccine vector.
At the time, the disclosed rationale was to try to come up
with an HIV vaccine, and to that end, Fauci, in 1999, funded research to create
“an infectious replication-defective recombinant coronavirus.”
In 2002, Ralph Baric, Ph.D. and colleagues at the University
of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, filed a patent on recombinant coronavirus, and
within a year, we got the world’s first SARS outbreak.
The real Anthony Fauci
“For more background on Fauci, be sure to read Robert
F. Kennedy Jr.’s book “The Real Anthony Fauci,” which details how Fauci’s
promotion of AZT during the 1980s ended up killing hundreds of thousands of
people. And the pattern we’re seeing with coronavirus is basically a repeat of
previous behavior. Martin says:
“It’s important to realize that at
the time [in 1984 when Fauci became director of the NIAID] we were
transitioning from an STD environment in which syphilis and gonorrhea and those
types of STDs were the things that we were concerned about …
“HIV became a political and social
hot potato because it was associated in many respects with lifestyle branding,
and as a result it became a political issue to essentially identify a class of
the population that could be the basis for research without consideration.
“The notion by Fauci was that
people with HIV had already made decisions that somehow entitled them to less
humanity. As a result, the clinical trials around developing both management
techniques as well as potential treatments … were done in a very reckless
fashion. Numerous people died in [those] clinical trials, and by the way, still
are …
“He has been obsessed about this
HIV situation as a platform to, essentially, use humans that he determines to
be some form of sub-human for clinical trials. It is a horrific blight on the
United States’ medical establishment that we have been willing to allow this to
go on in the name of science, in the name of health promotion, since 1984,
without any significant disruption or check.”
The first SARS outbreak
The first SARS outbreak occurred in late 2002 going into
2003 in China. Curiously, before Baric’s team invented and patented a
recombinant infectious replication-defective coronavirus, no one had ever heard
of SARS.
“I’m not drawing a causal
relationship,” Martin says. “I’m making an observation that humans and what we
call coronavirus seem to have cohabitated this earth for hundreds of thousands
of years.
“And then we manipulate that
[virus] in 1999. We start playing around with putting it into different animals
and different human cell line models, and then in 2003, we have SARS. Like a
lot of other things, it’s an observation worth noting.
“What makes the observation more
problematic, obviously, is this was happening during the unfortunate results of
the 2001 anthrax attack, which as you know came out of federal labs …
“[It] became very clear that this
was not [due to] a bad actor, per se. This was medical and defense research
gone bad that got into the public and people died. But the real benefit, if you
will, of the anthrax attack was the passage of the PREP Act.”
Anthrax attack provided desired liability removal
Inside the PREP Act we now have the carte blanche removal of
liability for manufacturers of medical countermeasures. As noted by Martin, the
PREP Act has “made pharmaceutical
companies much more capable of instilling terror in the population,
coercing a population into taking an untested measure, and doing so with
absolute impunity.”
Curiously, while Martin’s annual report on bioweapons
patents was, with only a few exceptions, appreciated and used by agencies
around the world, when it comes to the information he has amassed on coronavirus,
not a single agency anywhere in the world has been willing to address it.
“No one … seems to be willing to
look at the fact that beginning in 2016 we started seeing very alarming
language being used, which was ‘coronavirus poised for human emergence.’ This
was in patents, but also in scientific publications. And when you start
referring to a coronavirus allegedly poised for human emergence, after the
World Health Organization has declared SARS eradicated, there’s something
desperately wrong with that picture.”
Racketeering and organized crime
The biggest alarm bell was published Feb. 12, 2016, by EcoHealth
Alliance president Peter Daszak who, according to Martin, has been “the
money laundering agent” for gain-of-function
research coronaviruses after the U.S. implemented a moratorium on that kind of
research in 2014. Rather than close it down, this research was simply moved
over to China instead. In 2015, Daszak
stated:
“To sustain the funding base beyond
the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding of the need for
medical countermeasures, such as a pan influenza or a pan coronavirus vaccine.
“A key driver is the media and the
economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to
get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of
the process.”
That statement was made by Daszak in 2015, and was published
in the spring of 2016.
The statement “set off alarm bells very loudly within my
organization,” Martin says, “because when you have somebody who is promoting
gain-of-function research, and clearly blurring the line on what is even legal
… saying we need ‘media to create the hype’ … and ‘investors will follow if
they see profit’ … that doesn’t sound like public health.
“To me, that sounds like organized
crime. That sounds like racketeering, and we need to raise this issue.”
What the coronavirus patents show
In all, since 2002, some 4,000 patents have been filed on
the genome, vaccines and detection of coronavirus. According to Martin, this is
alarming, “because you don’t file patents on something that you don’t intend to
commercialize.”
Evidence of intended commercialization can also be found by
looking at the dates of certain patents by certain companies.
April 28, 2003, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention filed a patent on the genome of the SARS coronavirus. Five days
later, Sequoia Pharmaceuticals received a $935,000 grant and filed U.S. Patent
7151163 for a treatment for that same virus.
How can you file a patent for the treatment of a virus that
was only discovered five days earlier?
“That sounds like an inside job,”
Martin says. “Because you cannot have a pathogen identified and a cure for it
in five days, when all of the information was held from the public, because
when the CDC filed its patent on the genome of coronavirus, it paid to keep
that patent secret.
“So, somebody somewhere knows that
this thing was going to turn out to be a moneymaker … The proliferation of
proprietary controls around SARS Coronavirus probably exceeds at least by two
or three times most other pathogens …
“Dana Farber had a monoclonal
antibody patent system that came out of three NIH grants. Their patent 7750123
on the monoclonal antibody for SARS-Cov treatment took place in 2003.”
So, while we’ve been told that SARS-CoV-2 is something we’ve
never seen before, there are 4,000 patents and patent applications that say
otherwise. The same can be said for the testing and the COVID shots. For
example, Pfizer
filed the first S1 spike
protein vaccine patent on coronavirus in 1990 — 30 years ago.
“Regardless of what part of the
story we look at, the patent record is full of thousands of patents where
commercial interests funded by NIAID and the National Institutes of Health have
been building the economic cabal around coronavirus. This is not a new thing.
It hasn’t been a new thing.
“And regrettably, we’re being told
continuously that somehow or another there’s something novel about this
experience, despite the fact that every single part of what we are told is
being detected with PCR … the injections, every single one of those things has
been known and isolated for over 30 years.”
How did we get here?
How did we get to a point where taxpayers are funding
research on pathogens that are being designed to sicken and kill us, only
to drive profits into the drug industry and all these various patent holders,
which include the government itself?
In large part, it goes back to the implementation of the
Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, which allows the beneficiaries of federal grants to file
patents on work derived from federally funded research. The idea was that the
economy would benefit by allowing scientists to be entrepreneurs first, rather
than simply publishing their research.
This piece of legislation has undermined health care by
bringing the patent office, the FDA and Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) into an unholy trinity that serves and promotes private
pharmaceutical concerns. So, what we have now is an insidious funding loop.
Martin explains:
“Corporations and pharma lobby to
get people elected. Once they’re elected, the lobbyists flow an enormous amount
of money into the various NIH programs. In the case of NIAID, since Fauci took
over [in 1984], $191 billion have gone through his fingers. Now, is that
because he’s successful?
“No, as a matter of fact, under his
watch, allergies and infectious diseases have increased over 60 times. Yet
somehow or another, he’s still the director of a failed [agency] that’s gotten
$191 billion to solve a problem that is getting worse every single year.
“If it was a company, we would have
fired him. The problem is, it’s not a company. It’s a money laundering agency.
It moves public funds through the hands of a federal agency into the research
laboratories, which ultimately are going to conduct research that is then
licensed back to the benefactors, which are the pharmaceutical companies that
paid to get people into office in the first place.
“So, this is a revolving door
problem, and the Bayh-Dole Act created an insidious incentive that said that
the only research that was going to be conducted was going to be research that
ultimately would flow back to the pharmaceutical industry and create
juggernauts, where the risk of R&D was taken by the public and the benefit
for that R&D was taken by the private. That’s a horrible thing, and that is
exactly what Fauci has run.”
Why did Fauci pick Moderna as vaccine frontrunner?
Martin also points out that Fauci has also lied to Congress
about the NIAID’s financial interests in drugs. During this pandemic, Congress
and the Congressional Budget Office asked for an accounting of NIH-owned
patents where they have potential commercial interest in the drugs being
produced.
Fauci did not disclose any of them. Instead he lied and said
there are none.
“The evidence is stacked a mile
long,” Martin says. “Moderna stands alone as the only recipient of NIAID
funding that fails to comply with the law and fails to disclose the federal
government’s interest in their intellectual property.
“Despite the fact that everyone
knew Moderna
failed to disclose the federal government’s interest in its research, Fauci
picked Moderna to be the frontrunner for an untested, commercially unsuccessful
and entirely unproven mRNA vaccine technology in the spring of 2020.
“There was no rational
justification for that, and there would have been less rational justification,
given the fact that Moderna is on record as having violated the federal law,
the Bayh-Dole Act, 141 times at the time they were picked to be the winner.
“This is a known fact, but it was
overlooked entirely, and not a single law enforcement agent anywhere in the
United States has decided that having a criminal organization supply a product
sounds like a bad idea.”
Violations of law everywhere
Since the beginning of this pandemic, the number of rules,
laws and regulations that have been broken in the name of public health boggle
the mind.
Even laws that are absolutely clear and in no way ambiguous
are being broken. For example, under Code of Federal Regulations Title 21,
section 50, no one can be forced or coerced into a clinical trial of an
experimental medical product, even if it’s a pandemic countermeasure.
“It’s black and white, and this clinical trial does not end
until 2023 in the first best instance. So, there is no such thing as an
approved or even authorized use of a [COVID ‘vaccine’] that can be compelled on
the population,” Martin says.
And yet they’re bribing, threatening and coercing people
everywhere. The drug companies also violated basic principles by eliminating
all of the controls and giving the test vaccine to everyone in the trials,
leaving us nothing against which to compare side effects.
They also do not have an independent investigational review
board, or the statutorily required approval processes for the protocol.
The companies themselves decided to modify their protocols
midstream, which simply isn’t how it’s done. Basically, we do not have an
actual clinical trial on these COVID shots, because so many of the basic
principles of clinical medical research were violated.
Collapsed judicial system has put Big Pharma in charge
The federal government is also violating the False Claims
Act by telling you the COVID shots are safe and effective, when the studies are
still years from being completed, and have been undermined in all the ways just
mentioned.
“What we have is a situation where
the deaths are actually considered to be acceptable,” Martin says. “I don’t
know what world you have to come from to find that term even remotely
speakable. I think the utterance of that phrase is horrific … We are killing
people willfully, and we are doing it with impunity in the name of what we call
a love affair with science.
“The only problem is we’ve
desecrated science in the process because it turns out that when I did
randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, you know what I had to do?
I had to keep the populations blinded. I had to keep it placebo-controlled for
the whole clinical trial. And the reason I had to do that is because that’s
what the statute requires.
“This entire process has been
willful acts of harm to humanity. And the only hope we have is a very small
note in the Department of Justice opinion that took place under the Trump
administration, which says that if this was based on felony acts, then the
entire emergency use authorization and all its benefits would collapse.
“In other words, if we can show
that a felony has occurred — racketeering, lying to Congress, the public
coercion … [and] in the Fauci dossier
I outline dozens of felony violations — [it] would bring this entire thing to
its knees, because the moment the PREP Act protection falls away from Pfizer,
Moderna, Johnson
& Johnson, AstraZeneca
and others, I can guarantee you [Fauci] will not be promoting a vaccine.
“If they are liable for a single
injury or death, they’ll pull the plug on what they know to be unsafe. That
requires law enforcement to do its job. And somewhere there has to be a
prosecutor who’s willing to do their job … Right now, I genuinely do not think
we have three tiers of government. I don’t think there is a Department of
Justice.
“The judiciary is functionally gone
… When we allow the judiciary to be an arm of the executive [branch], then what
happens is we’ve actually lost the three-tiered structure of government. And,
as a result, the system collapses. The judiciary was the only thing that was
explicitly independent. We don’t allow judges to get sponsorship in campaign
finance. We don’t allow judges to be elected.
“We appoint them, we go through an
approval process. We do all sorts of things to try to make sure the judiciary
is independent. So, the only risk to the pharmaceutical industry, the only risk
to an executive out of control, was the judiciary.
“By collapsing the judicial system
in the United States, we have effectively made the government a servant of its
benefactors — and that is the pharmaceutical industry.”
How will it end?
With what appears to be a near-total collapse of the
judicial system, it looks like we’re on a straight path to global tyranny, with
no routes of escape. Martin, however, believes there may be a way out, but it
will require action on behalf of rational individuals blessed with foresight.
He explains:
“You have to have currency to buy
off politicians. Back in 2008, when we had the global financial crisis… we
instituted a policy that [will] functionally bankrupt our entitlement program
(Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid) in 2028 [or 2033] …
“The best math we have is that the
annuities and pension programs of the United States functionally run out of
their trust fund in 2028. What does that mean? Well, one of the things that
people overlook is there’s an unholy alliance between the insurance companies
and what we call health care.
“Insurance companies are long-dated
asset holders. These are the people who have to have money today to cover
issues in the future. That’s what a long-dated asset holder is. The problem is
that the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank and other central banks
have suppressed the value of the return on funds, so the funds are running out
of money faster than expected …
“You know as well as anybody else
that for a politician to stand up and say, ‘I’m going to abolish or
significantly alter Social Security’ is the death knell to any political
aspiration. Tiny problem. But whether they say it or not, the trust fund runs
out of money in 2028.
“Now, here comes the kicker: So
does the pharmaceutical industry because it turns out that the money that’s
going into that system is actually paying for the drug dependency of this
country.
“And if we go all the way back to
1604 — to the establishment of the British East India Company and the
establishment of the Virginia Company — we’ll realize that the 400-plus-year
tradition that we have, where we have built nation states on the back of the
drug trade, is coming to its end.
“The good news for all of us is
it’s going to end around 2028, because we have a convergence that they didn’t
figure out how to cover up. The convergence is that the people with the money,
the big pharmaceutical players, are the beneficiaries of a system that is going
to bankrupt itself by virtue of their actions.
“This is the brontosaurus that ate
too much because it was the biggest dinosaur. And the great news is they have
the brain the size of a pea, just like the brontosaurus. They are not smart.
And the best thing we have going for us furry humans is that we actually are
nimble.
“Now, does that mean that we are
not going to have an ounce of pain through the process? Absolutely not. There
is social disruption that we can’t even imagine on the horizon in 2026, 2027
and 2028, because 86 million people will lose what they thought was going to be
their retirement funds.
“When we see that number now go to
100 million people, and the 100 million people are sicker because of what we’ve
injected today … those people who are going to require greater health care then
are going to be faced with a bankrupt system incapable of supporting their life
and their livelihood. And that is the death knell of this story.
“The best news about this is we
have time if people of good conscience get together and say, ‘We’re not going
to let that apocalypse arrive because we have time to start building
communities that actually care for each other. We have time to start building
accountability structures.
“We have time to start doing things
that bring our social fabric together so that when that system collapses, we
can come back to a rational view of what life and liberty and the pursuit of
happiness is’ because, until we can reclaim the sovereignty of our health, we
cannot celebrate the sovereignty of our life.”
What about the 2030 agenda?
By now, you’ve probably heard of the World Economic Forum’s Great
Reset agenda, which includes the transition to a Central Bank Digital
Currency. With that, they can abolish the dollar and “reset” the entire global
economy that is now tottering on its last leg. However, even here there may be
kink in the plan that can save us.
“Like a good [James] Bond villain,
he’s actually ignorant of history,” Martin says. The reason Martin remains
optimistic that the Great Reset doesn’t have a chance at all to succeed is
because there’s no way the global public will embrace an all-digital system
that can be annihilated by an electromagnetic pulse or electromagnetic
disruption.
“This year alone, we’ve seen
internet failures, power outages and digital finance hacks that would leave
people stranded without a single penny were they reliant on an all-digital
financial system.
“The digital currency illusion is
the most bizarre and pathetic Dr. Evil plan anybody’s ever concocted,” Martin
says. “The fact of the matter is the digital currency craze is one of those
fantastical illusions that unfortunately has a single-point failure.
“We live in a world where actors of
both anarchist intent, and very, very laudable privateers and pirates are more
than happy to make sure that digital currency never sees the light of day
because they will, in fact, hack, crack and disrupt every system out there.
“And so, I look at the whole Great
Reset as great theater … But the entire illusion is being run because they’re
out of ideas. And … when the incumbency is out of bad ideas, they try
desperately to force you into a behavior that you would not otherwise accept.
All you have to do is just say no. Just don’t play along.”
The financial incentive for depopulation
Is it possible that the COVID jabs might cause premature
death and be an intentional form of depopulation? Well, since we’re following
the money, there’s certainly a financial incentive for such a scenario. As
noted by Martin, if you’ve made financial promises to people who are closing in
on retirement, the fewer there are of them the better.
“The financial interest for
depopulation is a thoroughly compelling argument,” Martin says. He recently
reviewed this argument in a lecture given at the Church of Glad Tidings in Yuba
City, which you can view above.
In short, having people live long enough to tap into their
Social Security benefits and live to the full maturity of their life insurance
policies is problematic with respect to the financial collapse that is looming.
Based on these financial realities — which certainly are not
advertised or publicly discussed — there’s clearly an economic incentive to
shrink the population and get rid of as many people as possible before 2028.
Unfortunately, based on previous lipid nanoparticle and mRNA
trials, the chance of a mass casualty event is high.
“There is no question … they jumped
over animal trials for a very important reason,” Martin says. “We’ve been told
it was to save time, but it wasn’t to save time.
“It was to put this particular
pathogen into humanity, so that a lot of people suffer and ultimately die of
effects that we could have picked up if we had done it the traditional way,
which is seven to eight years of safety studies, before we decide to put it in
the arms of humans.
“That’s not what we did. And if we
look at the safety data from animal studies on mRNA, and on the lipid nanoparticle,
there is no question that there is going to be a fatality increase because of
this …
“But the concern I have, [which may
be] more egregious [than] the death … is the malingering morbidity, people who
will require around the clock medical care is going to be a drain that will
infect our economy so deeply that we may not recover.
“Because if we have people who have
to stay at home with children who are sick, if we have people who have to care
for elderly parents who are sick, if we have people who are caring for a spouse
or a family member who are sick, that means we do not have the ability to enjoy
life and liberty. And the fact is that I think we’re going to have a bigger
morbidity than mortality event.”
Now, as if all of that weren’t enough, Martin has also
discovered CRISPR patents that describe
how they can “clip” the effects of mRNA/DNA-based vaccines from people. He
believes they may be building a pathogen set that is then introduced into the
population so that they can later introduce a more expensive technology that
can fix what was broken.
This, unfortunately, could mean survival may be based on
your ability to pay.
Were there excess deaths due to cOVID-19?
To backtrack for a moment, while we’ve been told COVID-19
caused excess deaths in 2020, one way to double-check that is to look at the
number of life insurance policies paid. And in 2020, there were actually fewer
life insurance policies paid out than normal, according to Martin.
“Whose numbers are you going to
believe? Are you going to believe the CDC who’s trying to pump and dump this
terror campaign of people dying, and therefore you need to have your mask on,
you need to socially distance, you need to vaccinate?
“Or are you going to believe the numbers
from the people who actually pay claims when real human life ends? It turns out
that if you look at the audited financial statements of the world’s largest
life insurance companies, we can find no excess death evidence. Is COVID so
smart that it only kills the uninsured? Is that what we’re supposed to
believe?”
Live consciously, aligned with health
In closing, I, like Martin, believe we can survive this and
keep our freedom. But we must act. Individually, every single person needs to
take actions that are in line with pro-life and liberty morals and ethics. As
suggested by Martin, spend your money on certified organic foods and locally
grown foods to help build a healthier food system.
Spend time with friends and family and share information.
Start building a sense of community again, in whatever way makes sense to you.
When you make a purchasing decision, analyze whether you’re supporting the evil
being perpetrated, or choking its money supply. We need to start building
micro-economies that can later grow into alternative economies. We need to
start building support structures for when the financial and health care
systems break.
“The fact is we are in a very
unique moment in human history, and it probably is as close to the story of
Joseph in Egypt as you can get. You know the seven fat years and then the seven
skinny years? Well, guess what? We have a couple of fat years left. You know
what we should be doing?
“We should be investing in our
networks of relationship. We should be investing in our networks of community.
We should be building those resilient fibers that hold us together because we
know that there is a famine coming. And we are in a unique position right now
to actually do something about it.
“So, start with yourself. Make sure
that what you put into your body is aligned to your health. Make sure that what
you do with your body is aligned to your health. And then as you do that,
invite other people into living a life that in fact models that behavior, so
that we start building communities of consciousness. And as we build those
communities, we will start building currencies of consciousness …
“There are a bunch of ways that we
can solve these problems, and we can do it using the market. We can do it using
our consciousness, but we need our consciousness, we need our community, and we
need our currency to be organically aligned to humanity again.”
How to break the propaganda cycle
Doing the things mentioned above will also further another
task at hand, which is to break the propaganda cycle. The key, really, is to
simply live your life as healthily and joyously as possible, so that people
around you can see there are others out there who aren’t living in fear.
Eventually, they’ll start seeing they actually have a choice.
“Listen, propaganda cannot stand
against the truth of a life well lived,” Martin says. “It can never stand
against that truth. What we’re trying to do is the wrong energy. We’re trying
to confront irrationality with rationality. But what we need to be doing is
being persistent in showing up and living in a way that people look at it and
say, ‘I’ll have what she’s having.’
“This is your ‘Harry Met Sally’
moment. This is that restaurant scene. This is your moment to be a person who
outlasts the half-life of the propaganda reflex. And I’ve seen way too many
people try to engage energetically in the debate where they enter into conflict
and it destroys their well-being.
“Don’t be the miserable angry one.
Be the one at the table who is the one worth looking at and going, ‘I’ll have
what he’s having. I’ll have what she’s having.’ Live a life that is desirable,
and you’ll see propaganda become emasculated instantaneously …
“All the time while Gov. [Ralph]
Northam here in Virginia was telling us that we could not have gatherings, we
continued our workshops. We had our table full of 15, 20, 25 people, and our
official policy was that if you signed up for our workshop, for the time you
were in our home we adopted you as family, because the legal exemption in
Virginia was that family didn’t count.
“So, we adopted everybody for the
week. We had every kind of cousin, uncle, aunt, brother, sister, child, granny.
It was all family. We went through the entire shutdown having a table full of
fellowship. And you know what? Everybody in the neighborhood said, ‘I’d love to
have what they’re having.’”
Originally published by Mercola.
Article reposted from: Children's
Health Defense
Dr. Martin's Source Documents:
Contact Dr. Martin: Activate Humanity
Dr. David Martin's Fauci/COVID-19 dossier documenting the following crimes:
35 U.S.C. § 101
18 U.S.C. §2339 C et seq. – Funding and Conspiring to Commit Acts of Terror
18 U.S.C. § 2331 §§ 802 – Acts of Domestic Terrorism resulting in death of American Citizens
18 U.S.C. § 1001 – Lying to Congress
15 U.S.C. §1-3 – Conspiring to Criminal Commercial Activity
15 U.S.C. §8 – Market Manipulation and Allocation
15 U.S.C. § 19 – Interlocking Directorates
35 U.S.C. §200 - 206 – Disclosure of Government Interest
21 C.F.R. § 50.24 et seq., Illegal Clinical Trial
The Commercial Actors
FAUCI/COVID-19 DOSSIER
COVID-19 Anti-Trust Video Documentary Clip
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act
For Full Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKX2TAoTTww
COVID-19 ANTI-TRUST SUMMARY PDF
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act
COVID-19 FULL EPISODE TRANSCRIPT
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act
A TIMELINE OF SELECTED FEDERAL FUNDING FOR SARS CORONAVIRUS
Dr. David Martin's SARS CoV Patent Corpus Literature Review reveals over 120 patented pieces of evidence to suggest that the declaration of a novel coronavirus was actually entirely a fallacy.
Dr. Martin's Legal Discovery with Atty. Reiner FuellmichDiscussing COVID-19 RICO, anti-trust and patent fraud violationsBlog Post with Transcript: https://shermanclay.blogspot.com/2021/09/rico-bioweapons-no-pandemic-no-novel.html
Contact Dr. Martin: Activate Humanity
Dr. David Martin's Fauci/COVID-19 dossier documenting the following crimes:
35 U.S.C. § 101
18 U.S.C. §2339 C et seq. – Funding and Conspiring to Commit Acts of Terror
18 U.S.C. § 2331 §§ 802 – Acts of Domestic Terrorism resulting in death of American Citizens
18 U.S.C. § 1001 – Lying to Congress
15 U.S.C. §1-3 – Conspiring to Criminal Commercial Activity
15 U.S.C. §8 – Market Manipulation and Allocation
15 U.S.C. § 19 – Interlocking Directorates
35 U.S.C. §200 - 206 – Disclosure of Government Interest
21 C.F.R. § 50.24 et seq., Illegal Clinical Trial
The Commercial Actors
COVID-19 Anti-Trust Video Documentary Clip
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act
For Full Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKX2TAoTTww
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act
Dr. David Martin's SARS CoV Patent Corpus Literature Review reveals over 120 patented pieces of evidence to suggest that the declaration of a novel coronavirus was actually entirely a fallacy.
https://shermanclay.blogspot.com/2021/10/fauci-and-unc-chapel-hill-imports.html
