Fauci and UNC Chapel Hill Import a Pathogen | Dr. David Martin

     

• AH Episode 58 • SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence • 


Contact Dr. David Martin: Activate Humanity
Dr. Martin's Evidence is located at the end of the post
 

Ben Swann: Fauci Lied to Congress about Funding Gain-of Function Research
HEADING SECTION OF THE STUDY

To follow along, the 2015 Gain of Function study can be accessed here: https://www.pnas.org/content/113/11/3048. 


1. This study was received for review on Sept. 4, 2015: When you’re doing research, you go through a process where you file a grant application. The grant application process which includes the process of writing it, submitting it, getting it approved and getting it funded takes about 12-18 months to go through. Then you do the research, whatever that research is. That research could take a couple weeks, it could take a couple months. In many places, like Ralph Baric’s lab at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, there is kind of a continuous stream of research going on. We cannot say that the research happened on a particular day and the reason why we can’t say that is because we just don’t know. What we do know is that this research had to happen before an exceptionally important date and the date this research took place was before September 4, 2015. [Fig. 1]
2. The article gets submitted, and it goes through a peer review process. All that means is that an editor of a journal sends the article out. The article gets reviewed by a number of people who critique it and say, ‘You should edit this or change this’ or ‘Hey, I ran your stats, and your stats don’t quite add up’—whatever they do—they send their critique back and it goes back and forth. That’s the reason why in most instances, you’ll see that while this paper was in fact submitted for review on September 4, 2015, it wasn’t approved until January 6, 2016. [Fig. 1]

3. January 6, 2016, is an important date too because the subject of this particular research was done at the: 1) Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3) Department of Cell Biology and Physiology and Marsico Lung Institute/Cystic Fibrosis Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. We see UNC Chapel Hill all over this paper. [Fig. 1]

4. We know this was edited by Peter Palese, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, and approved for publication January 6, 2016. [Fig. 1]

5. In October 2014, The U.S. Government issued a moratorium on gain of function (GoF) research.1

WHAT IS THIS PARTICULAR PAPER ABOUT?


6. Looking at the first paragraph shown in the above, this paper actually shows that there is a thing called a: WIV1-coronavirus (Cov) cluster that has the ability to directly infect and may undergo limited transmission in human populations. [NOTE: WIV=Wuhan Institute of Virology] [Fig. 2]


7. Now here’s where we have a tiny little problem. The tiny little problem was that the WuhanInstitute of Virology Virus 1 is in fact something that in 2015 was shown to be not only capable of going into a human population into lung tissue but it also has this sentence at the bottom of page one shown in the figure above: Importantly, monoclonal antibody strategies against SARS were effective against WIV1-CoV spike unlike available vaccine approaches. Together, the results highlight the utility of developing platforms to evaluate circulating zoonotic viruses as threats for future emergence and epidemic potential. [Fig. 2, 3]


8. Construction of Chimeric SARS-Like Viruses. Both wild-type and chimeric WIVCoV infectious clones were designed using published sequences and based on the SARS-CoV infectious clone (10). Synthetic construction of chimeric mutant and full-length WIV1-CoV were approved by the UNC Institutional Biosafety Committee and the Dual Use Research of Concern Committee. [Fig. 4]

9. So far from reading, we see that we’ve got a particular virus that came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and we actually have an in vivo. What does in vivo mean? This is a very important fact and that’s part of the reason why Anthony Fauci lied. An in vivo analysis is that you have the thing, the actual pathogen and in vivo means in a living system, that living system may be a model, it may be a culture, it may be a bunch of other things, but at the end of the day, what we know is that we actually have a Wuhan Institute of Virology spike protein that came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology sitting in a lab in North Carolina according to this particular article. [Point 8 is further explained in Points 19 and 20 of this report.] [Fig. 1-4]

10. Conclusion from Points 1-9: When Anthony Fauci was examined by Senator Rand Paul on May 11, 2021, Fauci very specifically said, “Dr. Baric does not do gain of function research, and if it is, it’s according to the guidelines and it is being conducted in North Carolina, not in China.”2 This is a FALSE STATEMENT.


11. IMPORTANT! Let’s look at the Biosafety and Biosecurity Section: Reported studies were initiated after the University of North Carolina Institutional Biosafety Committee approved the experimental protocol: project title: Generating infectious clones of Bat SARS-like CoVs; lab safety plan ID: 20145741; schedule G ID: 12279. These studies were initiated before the US Government Deliberative Process Research Funding Pause on Selected Gain of Function Research Involving Influenza, MERS, and SARS Viruses (www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/gain-of-function.pdf), and the current paper has been reviewed by the funding agency, the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Continuation of these studies has been requested and approved by the NIH. [Fig. 5]

12. These studies were initiated before the US Government Deliberative Process Research Funding Pause on Selected Gain of Function Research Involving Influenza: This IS the Gain of Function reference. [Fig. 5]

13. The current paper has been reviewed by the funding agency, the National Institutes of Health (NIH): Meaning that NIH and NIAID read and reviewed the protocol and reviewed this paper and specifically said that this was getting an exemption from what they knew to be an official pause on gain of function research. [Fig. 5]

14. Anthony Fauci lied to Congress when he said this did not happen.3


15. Here is the smoking gun! ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Section: We thank Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike protein. Research was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and the National Institute of Aging of the NIH under Awards U19AI109761 and U19AI107810 (to R.S.B.), AI1085524 (to W.A.M.), and F32AI102561 and K99AG049092 (to V.D.M.). Human airway epithelial cell cultures were supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease under Award NIH DK065988 (to S.H.R.). Support for the generation of the mice expressing human ACE2 was provided by NIH AI076159 and AI079521 (to A.C.S.): [NOTE: R.S.B.=Ralph S. Baric] [Point 14 is further explained in Points 19 and 20 of this report.] [Fig.6]


16. This graphic shows the details of the research that was supported by NIAID under grants U19AI109761 and U19AI107810 totaling $41.7 million.4,5 Over 40 million U.S. taxpayer dollars went into the amplification of making the Wuhan Virus more pathogenic to humans. That doesn't even include the BioDefense series that Fauci administered to DARPA and this included more than $21 million for additional gain of function research.6,7 [Fig. 7]


17. Here is a timeline of Grant U19AI109761 that we saw referenced in this particular gain of function study.8 In the previous graphic, we saw that this grant was funded by NIAID and awarded on Mar 7, 2014. This means that the paper’s authors lied when they said the researched commenced PRIOR to the gain-of-function moratorium because it actually happened DURING the gain-of-function moratorium and the amount of the contract is $31.2 million for Grant U19AI109761. This is one of 4 grants that were part of the research that was going on. [Fig. 8]

18. You cannot, if you are Anthony Fauci, deny that you lied. $60 million went through the hands of Anthony Fauci. This is not a—’it might have been’, ‘kind of maybe’, ‘it was a subgroup inside of NIAID’ that Anthony Fauci didn’t know about—This was Anthony Fauci. [Fig. 7, 8]

THE BOMBSHELL SUMMARY

19. When Rand Paul specifically asked Anthony Fauci about Ralph Baric and University of North Carolina, not only did Anthony Fauci lie, Fauci, in fact did something MORE ILLEGAL. IT IS ILLEGAL TO BRING A BIOLOGICAL WEAPON FROM ANOTHER COUNTRY INTO THIS COUNTRY.

20. Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 was harvested from bat Guano miners in 2013 who evidenced all of the symptoms that we now call COVD-19. So, we actually brought a foreign pathogen into this country—that’s a violation of so many laws, you can’t even count. We cloned and we manipulated it to enhance its’ spike protein and its’ ACE2 receptor interactions so that it became more infectious to human lung tissue. We did that in THIS country. [Fig. 5 references cloning: project title: Generating infectious clones]

21. And now we find out, the World Health Organization, in its self-critique, has decided that we need to have MORE viral expertise at the World Health Organization so that that they can in fact control the narrative more closely.9 The World Health Organization is aiding and abetting the weaponization biologics. Anthony Fauci has used the World Health Organization as his cover to shift the blame away from actions that he took, actions he funded.

♥ My deepest gratitude and heartfelt thank you to both David Martin and Ben Swann for your dedication and courage by speaking out and helping us understand the details and ramifications of this study. This report is a slightly edited transcript of their videos:

Dr. David Martin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_GuGcJt4kw

Ben Swann: https://rumble.com/vmi9i9-fauci-lied-to-congress-about-finding-gain-of-function-research.html

References and Sources:

  1. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/10/us-halts-funding-new-risky-virus-studies-calls-voluntary-moratorium
  2. https://www.foxnews.com/media/rand-paul-dr-fauci-lied-congress-china-virus-research
  3. https://www.foxnews.com/media/rand-paul-dr-fauci-lied-congress-china-virus-research
  4. https://govtribe.com/award/federal-grant-award/cooperative-agreement-u19ai109761
  5. https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/9069430#history
  6. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_GuGcJt4kw
  7. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1h3bqESVdqkwm123Ce4ZmA
  8. https://govtribe.com/award/federal-grant-award/cooperative-agreement-u19ai109761
  9. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/apr/29/government-rushes-out-request-for-experts-bolster-sage-panel

Dr. Martin's Source Documents:

Contact Dr. Martin: Activate Humanity

Dr. David Martin's Fauci/COVID-19 dossier documenting the following crimes:

35 U.S.C. § 101
18 U.S.C. §2339 C et seq.  – Funding and Conspiring to Commit Acts of Terror
18 U.S.C. § 2331 §§ 802 – Acts of Domestic Terrorism resulting in death of American Citizens
18 U.S.C. § 1001 – Lying to Congress
15 U.S.C. §1-3 – Conspiring to Criminal Commercial Activity
15 U.S.C. §8 – Market Manipulation and Allocation
15 U.S.C. § 19 – Interlocking Directorates
35 U.S.C. §200 - 206 – Disclosure of Government Interest
21 C.F.R. § 50.24 et seq., Illegal Clinical Trial
The Commercial Actors


FAUCI/COVID-19 DOSSIER

COVID-19 Anti-Trust Video Documentary Clip
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act
For Full Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKX2TAoTTww
Blog Post: 
https://shermanclay.blogspot.com/2021/09/covid-19-antitrust-violations.html

COVID-19 ANTI-TRUST SUMMARY PDF
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act


COVID-19 FULL EPISODE TRANSCRIPT
Violating the Entirety of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act


A TIMELINE OF SELECTED FEDERAL FUNDING FOR SARS CORONAVIRUS


Dr. David Martin's SARS CoV Patent Corpus Literature Review reveals over 120 patented pieces of evidence to suggest that the declaration of a novel coronavirus was actually entirely a fallacy.


Dr. Martin's Legal Discovery with Atty. Reiner Fuellmich
Discussing COVID-19 RICO, anti-trust and patent fraud violations


Dr. Martin's Viral Video with Stew Peters
Discussing Patriot Act, Domestic Terrorism Violations in regard to
COVID-19 bioweapon injections & bioweapon violations

THE BOMBSHELL SUMMARY
DR. MARTIN PRESENTS EVIDENCE OF U.S. FUNDING AND IMPORTING A PATHOGEN DURNING THE GAIN-OF-FUNCTION MORATORUM

Share:
spacer