• 2021 JUN 10 AFLDS files lawsuit against Secretary Becarra, Dr. Fauci, and Dr. Woodcock •
Alabama Lawsuit
Article Source:
https://magainstitute.com/the-lawsuit-weve-been-waiting-for-fauci-and-his-covid-19-federales-sued-to-personally-pay-for-their-abuses/
An exhaustively researched, very tightly reasoned, and persuasively pled
complaint condemning the Government’s COVID-19 response was filed today in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama to hold the
minute martinet, Anthony “Fluttering Fastball” Fauci and his co-conspirators
at DHHS, CDC, NIH, and FDA accountable for their reign of terror over
America.
Forty three named and unnamed plaintiffs led by America’s Frontline Doctors have sued Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
(DHHS) Xavier Becerra, both personally and in his official capacity, Director
of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr.
Anthony Fauci, both personally and in his official capacity, Acting
Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Dr. Janet Woodcock,
both personally and in her official capacity, DHHS itself, FDA itself, the
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institute of Health
(NIH), NIAID itself, and John and Jane Does I-V.
The theory of the case is that the EUAs were “the keys that unlocked the
profit potential of the COVID-19 crisis,” enabling vaccine manufacturers to
“reap billions of dollars in profit by exploiting the fears of the American
people.” The complaint further alleges that the vaccines “have the potential
to cause substantially greater harm than the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19
disease” themselves.
Defendants are seeking civil money damages from Secretary Becarra, Dr. Fauci, and Dr. Woodcock personally.
The Complaint alleges that the Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) under which
various “unapproved, inadequately tested, experimental, and dangerous”
COVID-19 vaccines have been sold and administered are unlawful on multiple
grounds and must be terminated immediately. The multiple grounds supporting
termination of the EUAs, and by extension, administration of all COVID-19
vaccines, follows.
First, the Complaint alleges that the Emergency Declaration upon which the
EUAs are all based was unjustified. Second, that the DHHS Secretary has failed
to satisfy the “criteria for issuance” of the EUAs set forth in Section 546 of
the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(c). Third, that the
DHHS Secretary has failed to satisfy the “conditions of authorization”
mandated by § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A). If the District Court finds any of these
grounds to be legally sustainable, the EUAs must as a matter of law be
terminated.
Plaintiffs Seek Multiple Rulings and Damages from Individual Defendants
The Plaintiffs are asking the District Court to review whether there was a
true “public health emergency” and to find that, since there was no such
actual emergency, that DHHS did not have the authority to declare such an
emergency, which would likewise nullify the EUAs.
the EUAs were “the keys that unlocked the profit potential of the COVID-19 crisis”
The Plaintiffs are also asking the District Court to determine that the EUAs
and extensions thereof are unlawful based on the grounds set forth above, that
the Defendants have violated customary international law by engaging in
non-consensual human medical experimentation, and that they have unlawfully
failed to implement protections for human subjects in medical
experimentation.
They are further asking the District Court to enjoin the enforcement of the
overall “public health emergency” declaration and renewals, enforcement of the
EUAs, and extension of the EUAs to children under the age of 16.
Finally, the Defendants are seeking civil money damages from Secretary
Becarra, Dr. Fauci, and Dr. Woodcock personally.
The case is Civil Action No. 2:21-cv-00702-CLM. A copy of the complaint follows.
