• 2021 AUG • David Martin on Vaccine Choice Canada •
Dr. David martin w/ Vaccine Choice Canada: on Canada’s role in producing the weaponized “COVID” injections which have seriously harmed and killed many.
TRANSCRIPT
David Martin
In 1998 we did the first ever audit of the patent systems of the United
States. of Canada. of Australia, of the European Union and elsewhere. And what
we found, quite tragically, is that an enormous number of crimes were being
committed using the patent system to, in fact, stand in the way of progress —
not to advance the innovation useful arts for which they were established.
And, specifically, in 1999 we uncovered what became the roots of our awareness
of the current pandemic that we’ve been exposed to. In 1999 we uncovered the
biological and chemical weapons patents that were proliferating around the
country and around the world.
And in 1999, going into 2000, we first reported on the weaponization of
biologic materials in violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties.
And among those weaponizations was in our first published report, for a number
of intelligence and law enforcement community, our identification of the
chimeric alteration and recombinant technologies around coronavirus — which in
1999 were first developed to serve as a means by which we could build a
vaccine vector, at the time thought to be useful for the treatment or
prevention of HIV.
The problem with that work was it very specifically, beginning in 1999 with
NIAID’s funding, directed by Anthony Fauci. It was very clear that what they
had done, in their gain-of-function research in 1999, was take what was a
normally occurring pathogen and turn it into what was then referred to as an
‘infectious non-transmissible pathogen”. In other words, they actually made it
more dangerous to the human. And they made it more dangerous so that it could
be used as a potential for vaccine vectors going forward. And that was in
1999…
…
This particular injection that we’re dealing with right now — this particular
injection is an mRNA model, computer generated, not derived from a living or
an organic material — this is a computer simulation of an mRNA strand which
was thought to be a means by which we could turn the human body into a
pathogen creator.
By that I mean the formation of the coronavirus-associated spike protein. And
for the first time in vaccine history — and once again, I’m using that term
because it’s what we’re calling it — and it is not, in fact, a vaccine. It’s a
gene therapy to create a bioweapon. But for the first time in vaccine history,
we are relying on the immune system to respond to a pathogen creation that we
first inject into people.
So, the fact of the matter is, we have an unprecedented outcome. And if we go
back and look at the patent record, if we go back and look at the laboratory
record, and if we go back and look at the funding record, we see that the
current pathogen called SARS-CoV-2 was clearly chimerically altered and was
clearly chimerically developed in the laboratory so that it can be used both
as a weapon and as a medical countermeasure in 2015.
University North Carolina at Chapel Hill — and we reported on this quite
significantly — funded by NIAID, developed and violated the International
Convention on Biological and Chemical Weapons — by taking a foreign uploaded
model of SARS-CoV-2, and turning it into a recombinant, chimeric pathogen —
which they said, and I quote, “was poised for human emergence”. And poised for
human emergence not in 2019 as we’ve been told by the propaganda — but that
publication was published in February of 2016. Published from work that was
done from 2013 to 2015.
There is no novel coronavirus. There is a weaponized version of a computer
simulation of a fragment that is, in fact, modelled to be the spike protein
analogous to what we’ve been told is the spike protein associated with
SARS-CoV-2.
The problem is we do not have anything that is actually derived from an actual
pathogen. And we do not have anything that’s actually responsive to the immune
system that was, in fact, responsive to a pathogen.
This is a computer simulation meant to harm and destroy what we call
humanity.
Ted Kuntz
You know, David, just listening to you — I mean nothing that you said is new —
and yet to hear it again still shocks me. That we are at this place, at this
time, globally killing humanity.
David Martin
Yes. And, according to Pfizer, we have what they refer to in their own
documents as an “acceptable death rate”.
I don’t know how many of you can sit with that statement. But the notion that
there is something called an “acceptable death rate” is something I find
morally repugnant.
But I find, more interesting than that, Canada’s role in this — which has
achieved almost no fundamental coverage in any media or even in the
counterculture media. And most Canadians don’t realize that Canada itself —
and not just Canada but specifically the University of British Columbia —
beginning in 2005 realized that, if it was going to be relevant in the biotech
space, it had to be the country and it had to be the research hot-bed for
establishing the delivery mechanism whereby mRNA vaccines could be
developed.
The University of British Columbia, working in partnership with the Inex
Pharmaceuticals in 2005, developed the lipid nanoparticle technology that
ultimately became the basis of the formation of a company in British Columbia
called Tekmira Pharmaceuticals.
In 2009 Tekmira had a very interesting set of challenges. And this was
commensurate with the 2008 declaration by the World Health Organization that
the coronavirus was, in fact, irradicated as a condition associated with
SARS.
And because of the lack of funding, in 2008 both Canada and the United States
struggled with the fact that they had developed the technology that was
supposed to be for a vaccination of coronavirus and for a number of other
viral models. But the problem was they ran out of funding.
And so there was a series of reorganizations. And in those reorganizations,
two companies were formed: Arbutus Pharmaceuticals and Acuitas
Pharmaceuticals. Acuitas is the one that, unfortunately, the government of
Canada has not told the citizens of Canada is the reason why both Moderna and
Pfizer have the ability to deliver the current bioweapons program.
And I think most people would be shocked to find out that when you have the
prime minister of Canada getting up in front of a camera in the spring of 2020
telling the world that the only way forward is to allegedly return to a new
normal when there is a vaccine.
What Trudeau did not tell the public was that he had a financial stake in the
outcome of that being the selected pathway forward.
What he didn’t tell the Canadian public was that Canada’s blight on the moral
record of what has been historically an amazingly wonderful set of innovations
coming out of the Canadian research institutions and research laboratories, in
fact created the mechanism whereby you could take mRNA and inject it into a
population and try to stabilize that injection.
The lipid nanoparticle technology that was developed, and ultimately passed to
Arbutus, was the subject of a licensing agreement that was made with Acuitas
Pharmaceuticals in British Columbia (private company) who conveniently had
very little reporting requirements. And Acuitas misappropriated the lipid
nanoparticle technology and ultimately made it available to both by BioNTech
and Moderna.
It is absolutely critical for us to understand that without the Canadian
contribution of the lipid nanoparticle technology from British Columbia we
would have no meaningful response in the form of what’s being called a
vaccination and we would not have a bioweapons program.
That’s a pretty important statement to make to an audience largely of
Canadians. And it would be very interesting to find out why it is that Trudeau
has not admitted to the public, and has been unwilling to actually put into
the public record, the, what we know to be. at least billions of dollars of
concessions. And it could be — I mean if we look at just Pfizer-BioNTech’s own
situation — we know that in the case of Pfizer-BioNTech, that last quarter
alone somewhere between eight and nine billion dollars came in the form of the
revenue off of all of the interventions that are being sold off as coronavirus
vaccines.
In the last quarter alone, this would place this tiny little British Columbia
company — which in 2009, people, was functionally owned by one person. I mean
we need to kind of bear that in mind — one person actually owns this company.
Thomas Madden who is the CEO of Acuitas –in 2009 he was largely the sole owner
of it. He actually appropriated the technology in a labor dispute, which
functionally was a trade secret argument around this.
And when we actually look at what happened in 2016 — and this is a very
important point, people — in 2016 somebody in Canada knew that there was
something going to happen with this particular vaccine platform. Because in
2016 Arbutus Pharmaceuticals and Acuitas Pharmaceuticals got into litigation
on whether or not the license for the lipid nanoparticle technology that
Acuitas had from Arbutus was, in fact, capable of being extended to other
pathogens.
And in 2016 there was a significant amount of litigation and the license that
Acuitas had to use lipid nanoparticle technology, developed by Tekmira,
developed by Arbutus, the license was actually terminated in 2016. That
coincides with the weaponization of SARS-CoV-2…
…There’s no public information to tell us what precisely transpired in 2016 —
which allowed this particular dispute to erupt between these two Canadian
firms, all based in the history of Tekmira. But somewhere in 2016 somebody
knew that there was a lottery win to be had.
And my guess is that somewhere inside of the Canadian health system, and
somewhere inside NIAID and the Vaccine Research Center, and somewhere inside
the UNC Chapel Hill records, we will find that Trudeau government was fully
aware by at least 2018 that we were going to have a significant pandemic
requiring this core technology to be unleashed on the world — courtesy of the
Canadian collaboration on lipid nanoparticles.
And there’s no question that by the time we get to 2019, March 19 specifically
of 2019, we know that Arbutus, Moderna, Pfizer-BioNtech and others were, in
fact, working on a vaccine for respiratory pathogen. And we know that
information because they amended their patent filings to say exactly that.
Ted Kuntz
So let me just unpacked this a little bit, David.
Your revealing evidence here — that this technology has been in the works in
Canadian University of British Columbia, supported by government of Canada,
for a number of years now.
It was clear that there was a goldmine to be had here because there was a
fight over it.
And when Trudeau announced in 2020 that we needed a vaccine to get back to
normal, he didn’t say ‘Listen we’re part of the solution here. We’ve developed
technology is gonna save the world.’ He didn’t talk about how great Canadian
technology is.
I know you don’t like to speculate, but why would he not celebrate and
announce that to the world?
David Martin
Well, I think it’s very clear that he has, for a significant period of time,
become extremely compromised in the fact that he pretends, on the one hand, to
be a victim of a public health crisis and, on the other hand, not unlike the
governor of New York, the spokesperson for the alleged level-headed response
of draconian lockdown and countermeasure approaches — which create the market
demand that says that we’re going to remove civil liberties, we’re gonna
remove the right for people to actually engage in any civil discourse. But, in
fact, what we’re gonna do is pretend like we are somehow the victims of a
natural set of events that have unfolded.
The fact of the matter is, he knows very good and well because he was party to
— and the government certainly was party to agreements with Pfizer, with
Moderna and with others — where there was no question that Canadian firms knew
good and well that the lipid nanoparticle technology was actually a frontline
contender for a respiratory pathogen simulation.
And, by no later than September of 2019, the Canadian government was fully
aware and participating in what was supposed to be a global exercise to test
the readiness of the world to deal with a respiratory pathogen pandemic that
was planned and published in September of 2019.
And the Canadian government was very much a party of that. So, there’s no
chance that this was not fully known, fully anticipated, fully
premeditated.
And there is no question that the script that Trudeau read from was a script
that was in fact marketing what would become a federal restraint of trade
violation in Canada — which was a very important restraint of trade.
By making the allegation, before we even knew what the actual pathogen was
technically, what we know is: that Trudeau’s statements biased the marketplace
against the consumer, so that there was, in fact, declared by the government a
single pathway, a single market opportunity, out of this particular
pandemic.
And by telling the world that the only way forward was a vaccine, what that
did was, it actually precluded the use of life-saving countermeasures that
were medicines that could have helped and could have supported the health of
people.
And instead of that, we watched people die while we were waiting for an
economic windfall. And that economic windfall is going to a private
corporation whose accountability is not to a shareholder, is not anything that
has public visibility. It has the private benefit of being a private British
Columbia company they can be used as a front for all manner of things.
And it is, in fact, without question, participating in one of the greatest
crimes in terms of racketeering and collusion that this world has ever
seen.
Ted Kuntz
Well, David, that was the question in my head. What kind of crimes are these?
I mean this is treason, amongst other things. This is criminal. This is
homicide.
David Martin
Yeah, and it’s important for us to really focus in on this because most people
have heard me talk about the racketeering and antitrust laws that are
violated. And both the U.S. and Canada have very robust antitrust laws.
The fact of the matter is there’s three fundamental elements of antitrust and
all three are violated.
The first is that you cannot do what’s called market allocation. In other
words, you cannot use either a public or a private institution where colluding
parties get together and say we are going to tell the consumer what their only
option is. That’s a market allocation violation of a racketeering thing.
You also cannot suppress information and coerce people into accepting a single
scenario when the market forces are not at play. In other words, you cannot
suspend from market consideration other alternatives — so that you pick the
only winner in which, by the way, you’ve already placed bets on the table in
the form of funding and you also have an economic gain.
And you can guarantee yourself that the Canadian government knows very good
and well that it has huge economic gains to gain from the use of the lipid
nanoparticle technology. And it had everything to lose if the lipid
nanoparticle technology didn’t win.
So we know that the collusion was there. We know that the racketeering was
there. We also know that there was insider information, non-transparent
transactions from what’s called interlocking directorates — where individuals
who have the ability to set prices, to allocate research dollars and to
ultimately set acquisition policy to take that technology on board — is in
fact by very definition the racketeering that is anti-competitive,
antitrust.
Now why is this important? It’s important because these are all felony
violations. And what makes a felony violation far more important than a civil
crime, is that a felony violation actually pierces the veil of corporate
liability.
And this is a very important point, people need to understand. The reason why
I’m so obsessed with going after felonies, and not going after civil cases, is
because the felony violation of antitrust laws which is prima facie
established in this pandemic, would, in fact, mean that the manufacturers
would not have the protections provided here in the United States under the
1986 Act, under the PREP Act and, in Canada, under those acts’
equivalents.
In other words, no corporation gets civil liability immunity if they are
complicit in a felony crime.
And once we establish that that is, in fact, the case –which by the way does
not require legal expertise — this is a prima facie case, meaning the facts
present themselves — there is no question that this was an act of racketeering
and collusion.
There is no question that this is an act of willful manipulation of market
forces in violation of statutes both sides of the border. And the fact of the
matter is, the minute this becomes felony violation, all of the liability
flows back. Civil and criminal liability flows back to the manufacturer.
And I can guarantee that the day Pfizer and Moderna have to be on the hook for
the lives they’re harming and the lives that they’re taking — there is no
question that the entire terror campaign would shut down the next day…
…
The civil society of the world has been duped to believe that we should be
arguing about face masks and social distancing, whether businesses stay open
or not. We have been duped into having a conversation that is the wrong
conversation.
There is a crime that is being committed. Our public officials are complicit
in that crime. And there is no question, as a civilization, we owe it to
ourselves and future generations to make sure that we are not silent while
those who are in positions of elected authority are committing willful acts of
crimes against humanity.
Ted Kuntz
With this information should there not be a criminal investigation starting
this minute?
David Martin
There absolutely should be. Here in the United States, we have the unfortunate
reality of not having the benefits of some of what you guys have in Crown law.
But the fact of the matter is, in Canada as well as the rest of the
Commonwealth, you actually have a mechanism where you can allege and actually
initiate criminal proceedings without relying on the Justice Department we
have in the U.S.
We know that our DOJ here in the United States is entirely corrupt. We know
that they have been willfully incapable of prosecuting any of the known crimes
— which by the way, include here in the United States. One of the one of the
best-known crimes, that apparently we can now get away with, which is lying to
Congress.
As most of you now Anthony Fauci has now on two documented occasions actually
lied to Congress — which is a violation of…Section 1001 of the Criminal
Statute. But lying to Congress is something that Fauci started doing in the
fall of 2020 when he willfully failed to disclose the financial interests that
NIAID had in a number of the technologies that were being promoted in this
particular pandemic, failed to disclose NIAID and NIH’s financial interest in
a request that was made by Congress.
In a report submitted to Congress, Anthony Fauci lied about his financial
position which is, in fact, a felony…
…
We know that there are countless crimes which are felony violations on both
sides of the border.
And we know that it will not be until the public forces this into action that
any action will be taken…
…
There is no question that your prime minister has violated, not only the laws
of Canada, but has participated in a bioweapon’s treaty violation.
And let me be very precise on why I say that, because when I make an
allegation, it has to stick. And the allegation comes from the definition of a
bioweapons program.
Inside the definition of biological and chemical weapons, the manufacture, or
the ability to provide the means by which you manufacture a biological weapon,
defined under the statute as a fragment or a modeled fragment of a pathogen
known to cause human harm.
The fact that it is Canadian-company technology that is required to deliver
this particular weapon means that the government of Canada is complicit in
violating biological and chemical weapons laws. And that falls to the prime
minister. So, when I make the allegation I’m dead serious about it…
Ted Kuntz
…The impact of this, the consequence of this, is so significant. It needs to
be heard. It needs to be broadcast from coast to coast.
We need to recognize what we’re facing. And we’re facing the active crimes
against humanity as we speak…
David Martin
…I am unwilling to be silent because I know that I actually have information,
and I have compiled information.
And the bad news for people like Trudeau is, if you think that this is the
only piece of information, I have on things that he’s been involved in, that’s
the tip of the iceberg.
The fact of the matter is, I’m very comfortable making public allegations
against public seated people in authority because I happen to know that this
is not one situation, this is not isolated. This is the beginning of a
contest, and I would be more than delighted to find out how deep they want to
go head-to-head with me on what I know about their actions…
…
In 2014 the veterinarian Peter Daszak, who ran EcoHealth Alliance, the company
that has been criticized for its role in laundering NIAID funds to the Wuhan
Institute of Virology. But it’s important for you to all realize that in 2014
Peter Daszak specifically said at a public meeting, ‘We need the public to
accept a medical countermeasure for pan coronavirus vaccine.’ And I’m quoting
from him. ‘We need the media to create the hype and we need to use the hype to
our advantage. Investors will follow if they see profit at the end of a
process.’
Those are the published words of the guy who was the Wuhan Institute of
Virology SARS-CoV-2 architect…
…
And if we, in fact, have the perpetrators of this crime telling us that they
are going to do the crime, why are we left sitting at a gate in 2020 or 2021
going ‘Oh, man that just sounds like a conspiracy’.
Well, it sounds like a conspiracy because it is a criminal conspiracy. It is a
racketeering conspiracy meant to harm and destroy human life…
Ted Kuntz
David, could you connect some dots for us? Why is this injection so important
to their agenda? What piece does it play in the larger agenda?
David Martin
Well, once again, let’s go back and visit that statement made by Peter
Daszak.
As you all know we had a period of time where the idea of a vaccine became
quite popular among a certain ilk within the established public health
community.
We know that, beginning with the 1986 Act, there was a means by which
pharmaceutical companies were very interested in sheltering themselves from
liability because they knew they were entering a phase where the increased
danger of their actions was going to ultimately mean that business was not
viable.
If you know you’re going to harm a population, you need to make sure that you
do the groundwork to make sure, from a litigation standpoint, you move
yourself as far away from prosecution as possible.
We know that, beginning in 1986, there was a commitment on the part of the
people who bought Congress, bought elected officials in the U.S., in Canada
and around Europe — and in 1986 there was a willful act to take what was
supposedly a loss-leading public health product, like vaccines, and turn it
into a money-maker.
And it turns out, it’s a great idea to do that. Because if what you’re going
to do is ultimately trying to sell people on a whole host of other
pharmaceuticals, it is exceptionally good to build the autoimmune disease
pattern which builds habituation to classic pharmaceutical intervention. That
began in 1986.
And as we moved into the 1990s, it became very clear that the HIV campaign,
which was supposed to be the giant payday — where we had the ability to
somehow finally get everybody to be afraid of the pathogen — didn’t pay off
very well because it was classified as a lifestyle-oriented disease. And then
what we had in the mid-1990s was the birth of the obsession about what was
called a universal influenza vaccine.
The desire on the part of industry was to make sure that every person would
get addicted to taking the influenza shot every year. It’s a great money
maker. It’s a wonderful way for the industry to keep jabbing people on an
annual basis.
And the problem with that is, as we all know, the influenza vaccine was far
less effective than people hoped it would be. And the public, not
surprisingly, wasn’t willing to fall for it — which led to a series of
meetings which took place at the NIAID advisory council, together with
international partners, to come up with a way to build a mechanism whereby we
could convince the world that we needed to have a universal vaccine program
for the world.
The World Health Organization, NIAID, the Vaccine Research Center, and their
international collaborators got together and said, basically what we need is —
we need to have an event which allows a mass campaign of terror to be
unleashed, so that the public accepts something.
And so they went down the pathway of a universal influenza and a universal
coronavirus vaccine.
Tragically, there is, in fact, no evidence that either of the pathogens was
isolated. There was no evidence that we had a basis to create this mass
campaign of terror. And, even in what was reportedly a pandemic, we actually
didn’t have people getting sick from the pathogen.
One of the reasons why the World Health Organization made it abundantly clear
that “covid” could be declared with no laboratory evidence is because, if in
fact there was a requirement for laboratory evidence, we would actually have
to test for a virus.
But you didn’t have to have Covid-19. You had to have a series of clinical
symptoms.
Ironically, what we have now is a situation where we are, in fact, injecting
people — and this is where we need to get very clear on this and remember,
people, if you don’t hear anything else, remember the word vaccine is
misleading.
What is happening is the mRNA computer simulation of an S1 spike protein,
thought to be modeled off of the possible SAR-Cov-2 — and so you got all of
those preconditions.
This is not a virus. This is not to disrupt a virus. This is actually an
injection to make your body produce a foreign pathogen. That’s what this
injection is…
…
Every single public statement that says that this is a covid vaccine is a
lie…
…
We do not have an injection that is, in fact, associated with the actual
pathogen model that is called SARS-CoV-2. And, as a result, we must call it
what it is — a foreign-supplied computer model, delivered to the world from
China at some point in the early hours of 2020, sometime between January 7 and
January 20.
It is a computer model of a simulated pathogen which was simulated from sample
populations of as many as 40 people prior to the 30th of December. That model
that was uploaded to servers around the world was then used to identify a
computer model of what might be the mRNA strand that would code the spike
protein…
…
Our elected officials have willfully coerced the population, using acts of
domestic terror…
Ted Kuntz
What can we do now? What’s the most important thing we ought to be focusing
our energy and our attention on now?
David Martin
Well, as a Commonwealth country, what I would say is that you need to
reexamine your statutory basis of action and make sure that your members of
parliament are inundated with the information that we’re sharing right
now.
Complicity with allowing government-committed crime in Canada is something
that must, must be done immediately. And if you are living north of the
U.S./Canada border, you know, your member of parliament must be informed that
there is an active racketeering and criminal conspiracy that is actively
harming the public and it is using the resources, the wealth, and the
innovation of Canada to violate international and domestic bioweapons and
bioterrorism statutes.
So, the first thing is to make sure that people hear this message.
The second thing is to hold them accountable…
…
The crimes that are being committed are racketeering, bioweapons and, in fact,
at least reckless homicide, if not willful murder of massive members of our
population. And we cannot sit idly by and allow that to persist…
…
It actually is human to stand with the truth. And I am delighted to stand, not
only with the certainty of what I know, but I’m delighted that we have the
thousands of people who are participating in this conversation — who are
ultimately going to now have a firm foundation upon which they can stand to
make sure that they have the ability to have the candle of truth against the
torrent of the darkness of those who wish to destroy us.
We will, as we the people, we will prevail…
Transcript Highlights prepared by Truth Comes to Light
